RE: question about headers

[Schwarz Konrad <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Clive D.W. Feather [mailto:yyyyy@xxxxxxxxx] 
> [...]
> Note that each form allows the implementation to convert the 
> requested header name to a file name in some way, not 
> necessarily use it unaltered. For example, <stdio.h> might be 
> converted to "syshdr-stdio", while "stdio.h" might be 
> converted to "include/h/stdio".

Am I correct in following that strictly-conforming applications must not use
the # include <...> syntax for application-defined headers?

In that case, David Korn would be in error and I would suggest this to be
pointed out either in the C standard or rationale.