| To: | yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Defect in XCU ed |
| From: | "Thomas E. Dickey" <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:07:24 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200308140812.JAA21662@xxxxxx> |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Defect report from : Andrew Josey , The Open Group
>
> (Please direct followup comments direct to yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>
> @ page 343 line 13238 section ed objection {nine-bit-bytes}
>
> Problem:
>
> Edition of Specification (Year): 2003
>
> Defect code : 1. Error
>
> Here and elsewhere in XCU we come across statements
> of the form : "If the size of a byte on the system is greater than
> nine bits, the ... is implementation-defined".
>
> This appears to be for systems outside of the standard, which
> requires support for 8 bit bytes
Which standard? ISO C specifies that a byte must contain at least 8 bits,
but doesn't appear to set a maximum.
--
T.E.Dickey <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Defect in XCU ed, ajosey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Defect in XCU ed, Don Cragun |
| Previous by Thread: | Defect in XCU ed, ajosey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Defect in XCU ed, Don Cragun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |